Drive Proof Rack from your own code

{ "ok": true,  "data":  { ... } }
{ "ok": false, "error": { "code": "...", "message": "...", "status": 402, "details": { ... } } }

{
 "task": "audit",
 "product": "Vellisip smart bottle",
 "asking": "a $149 early-bird pledge",
 "claims": "[{\"id\":\"C1\",\"text\":\"Meet Vellisip, the revolutionary bottle that changes how you look after your health.\",\"marks\":[\"hype\",\"health\"]},{\"id\":\"C2\",\"text\":\"It is the world's first bottle that tests 120 health markers from a single sip of water in under 60 seconds.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"hype\",\"health\"]},{\"id\":\"C3\",\"text\":\"Our AI is 99.9% accurate at spotting vitamin deficiencies, according to our projected results.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"render\",\"health\"]},{\"id\":\"C4\",\"text\":\"The renders above show the final design, which wil ... (808 characters)"
}

{
 "task": "audit",
 "verdict": "walk-away",
 "title": "Vellisip: renders and projected results",
 "summary": "Six claims describe Vellisip, and five of them rest on renders, projected results, or broad health and breakthrough language rather than anything built or tested. The remaining claim compares its price to traditional blood tests without naming which ones. Independent test results, footage of a working unit, and a named point of comparison would change this picture before any pledge.",
 "claims": [
  {
   "id": "C1",
   "rung": "asserted",
   "flaw": "phantom",
   "why": "This claim says Vellisip changes how you look after your health, but it names no test, study, or result behind that change.",
   "ask": "What evidence or result backs the claim that Vellisip changes how you look after your health?"
  },
  {
   "id": "C2",
   "rung": "asserted",
   "flaw": "phantom",
   "why": "This claim says the bottle is the world's first to test 120 health markers from a single sip of water in under 60 seconds, but it gives no test or result showing it does this.",
   "ask": "What test or result shows the bottle testing 120 health markers from a single sip of water in under 60 seconds?"
  },
  {
   "id": "C3",
   "rung": "asserted",
   "flaw": "phantom",
   "why": "This claim gives a 99.9% accuracy figure for spotting vitamin deficiencies, but says it comes from projected results rather than a result from a built product.",
   "ask": "What actual test result, rather than a projection, shows the AI's accuracy at spotting vitamin deficiencies?"
  },
  "... (6 in all)"
 ],
 "asks": []
}

{
 "task": "audit",
 "product": "Dozuvo sleep earbuds",
 "asking": "a $89 preorder",
 "claims": "[{\"id\":\"C1\",\"text\":\"Each bud weighs 4 g and sits flush inside the ear.\",\"marks\":[\"number\"]},{\"id\":\"C2\",\"text\":\"Get up to 40 hours of battery life from the charging case.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"up-to\"]},{\"id\":\"C3\",\"text\":\"Dozuvo blocks 3x more noise than ordinary foam earplugs.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"relative\",\"vs-unnamed\"]},{\"id\":\"C4\",\"text\":\"In our own tests with 18 beta testers, 16 said they fell asleep faster.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"proof-own\",\"sample:18\"]},{\"id\":\"C5\",\"text\":\"Watch our working prototype in the demo video ... (585 characters)"
}

{
 "task": "audit",
 "verdict": "ask-first",
 "title": "Dozuvo sleep earbuds battery and noise",
 "summary": "Five claims, three resting on a best case, an unnamed baseline or a small in-house test; the weight and fit claim and the demo video claim stand on their own. Naming the compared earplugs, sharing a typical battery figure, and testing a larger group would make the picture clearer before backing it.",
 "claims": [
  {
   "id": "C1",
   "rung": "asserted",
   "flaw": "none",
   "why": "This states the bud's weight and fit, which the buyer can check once it arrives.",
   "ask": "Will an outside reviewer confirm the weight and fit?"
  },
  {
   "id": "C2",
   "rung": "asserted",
   "flaw": "cherry-pick",
   "why": "This gives the top end of the battery life range, not the figure a typical user would get.",
   "ask": "What is the typical battery life for most users?"
  },
  {
   "id": "C3",
   "rung": "asserted",
   "flaw": "strawman",
   "why": "This compares the noise blocked to ordinary foam earplugs, which is not a named product, so the comparison cannot be checked.",
   "ask": "Which specific earplug products were compared to get that figure?"
  },
  "... (5 in all)"
 ],
 "asks": []
}

{
 "task": "audit",
 "product": "Flarnick pocket stove",
 "asking": "a $59 pledge",
 "claims": "[{\"id\":\"C1\",\"text\":\"The Flarnick pocket stove is made of titanium and weighs 86 g.\",\"marks\":[\"number\"]},{\"id\":\"C2\",\"text\":\"In tests by an independent outdoor-gear lab, it boiled 1 litre of water in 4 minutes 10 seconds; the lab's full report is posted in our updates.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"proof-outside\",\"proof-own\"]},{\"id\":\"C3\",\"text\":\"1,200 stoves from our first campaign were delivered to backers in March.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"proof-outside\"]}]"
}

{
 "task": "audit",
 "verdict": "back-it",
 "title": "Titanium stove, independent tests, delivered",
 "summary": "Three claims: a titanium build and weight you can check on delivery, a boil-time test run by an independent outdoor-gear lab with the report posted, and a report that stoves from an earlier campaign already reached backers. All three hold up as written, with two backed by an outside check, so the claims back the pledge. That means the claims stand as written, not that the stove is worth the money.",
 "claims": [
  {
   "id": "C1",
   "rung": "asserted",
   "flaw": "none",
   "why": "This states the stove's material and weight, a plain spec the buyer can confirm when it arrives.",
   "ask": "Will you publish a measured weight from a finished production unit?"
  },
  {
   "id": "C2",
   "rung": "checked",
   "flaw": "none",
   "why": "An independent outdoor-gear lab measured the boil time and the full report is posted for anyone to read.",
   "ask": ""
  },
  {
   "id": "C3",
   "rung": "checked",
   "flaw": "none",
   "why": "Stoves from the earlier campaign have already been delivered to backers, which backers themselves can confirm.",
   "ask": ""
  }
 ],
 "asks": []
}

{
 "task": "audit",
 "product": "Glimmowa lamp",
 "asking": "",
 "claims": "[{\"id\":\"C1\",\"text\":\"Glimmowa is the first lamp designed by people who love mornings.\",\"marks\":[\"hype\"]}]"
}

{
 "task": "audit",
 "verdict": "needs-claims",
 "title": "Glimmowa lamp designed by people",
 "summary": "Only one claim came through, and a rack needs at least two before it can be compared on rungs and flaws. The one claim says Glimmowa is the first lamp designed by people who love mornings, which describes the product rather than stating anything that can be checked. A few more claims, especially ones with numbers or tests behind them, would make a real audit possible.",
 "claims": [],
 "asks": [
  "What does the lamp do, in numbers?",
  "What tests, if any, were run, and by whom?",
  "Has anything already been delivered to customers or backers?"
 ]
}

const K = RackKit;
const form = K.form({ product: "Dozuvo sleep earbuds", asking: "an $89 preorder",
  page: "Get up to 40 hours of battery life.\nBlocks 3x more noise than ordinary foam earplugs.\nIn our own tests with 18 beta testers, 16 slept better." });
console.log(K.flags(form), K.guess(form), K.lean(form));   // the flags, the page's reading per claim, its lean
const wire = K.toWire(K.buildInput("audit", form).input);  // POST this to /estimate and /run
// then: const audit = K.normalize(K.parseReply(job.output.output));
// const { notes } = K.check(audit, form);                   // the page's re-check of the reply
// K.letter(audit, form)                                     // the questions for the creator, as a message

BASE="https://api.skillsafe.ai/v1/app-api"
TOKEN="paste-your-token-here"   # from https://proof-rack.skillsafe.ai/tokens.html
api() { # api METHOD PATH [JSON-BODY]
  curl -s -X "$1" "$BASE$2" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
    ${TOKEN:+-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"} ${3:+--data "$3"}
}

# a guest token (enough for /me and /estimate); a run needs your personal token from /tokens.html
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST "$BASE/guest" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"slug":"proof-rack"}' | jq -r '.data.token')

api GET /me | jq '.data | {subject_type, credits}' 

# input.json: the run input object - {"task": "audit", "product": "Dozuvo sleep earbuds", "asking": "a $89 preorder", "claims": "[{\"id\":\"C1\",\"text\":\"Each bud weighs 4 g and sits flush inside the ear.\",\"marks\":[\"number\"]},{\"id\":\"C2\",\"text\":\"Get up to 40 hours of battery life from the charging case.\",\"marks\":[\"number\",\"up-to\"]}, ...]"}
api POST /estimate "$(cat input.json)" | jq '.data | {hold_credits, min_credits, model, model_alias, markup_bps, warnings}' 

KEY="proof-rack:audit:$(shasum -a 256 input.json | cut -c1-16):a1"
JOB=$(curl -s -X POST "$BASE/run" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Idempotency-Key: $KEY" --data @input.json | jq -r '.data.job_id')
while :; do
  J=$(api GET "/jobs/$JOB"); S=$(echo "$J" | jq -r '.data.status')
  case "$S" in succeeded|failed|cancelled) break;; esac; sleep 2
done
echo "$J" | jq -r '.data.output.output' > reply.json   # one JSON object, the reply contract
echo "$J" | jq '.data | {charged_credits, truncated}' 

# Server-Sent Events: tick/delta events while the job runs, then a final event with the job
curl -N -s -X POST "$BASE/run-stream" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Idempotency-Key: proof-rack:audit:$(shasum -a 256 input.json | cut -c1-16):a1" --data @input.json